- 264comments
- 251comments
- 44comments
- 5comments
- 272comments
- 68comments
- 54comments
- 78comments
- 58comments
- 12comments
- 62comments
- 246comments
- 5comments
- 183comments
- 15comments
- 1comments
- 179comments
- 26comments
- 19comments
- 55comments
- 201comments
- 4comments
- 91comments
- 5comments
- 41comments
- 16comments
- 186comments
- 3comments
- 152comments
- —discuss
Aren't number 1 and number 5 opposed ?
Not really.
#1 is about using fresh and original figures of speech. #5 is about using plain language and avoiding jargon.
Okay.
Can someone send this to Pando Daily, please? Love their content, dislike their style.
This Mark Twain quote is mind-blowingly fantastic: “At times he may indulge himself with a long one, but he will make sure there are no folds in it, no vaguenesses, no parenthetical interruptions of its view as a whole; when he has done with it, it won't be a sea-serpent with half of its arches under the water; it will be a torch-light procession.”
Ironically, "How to write like a reporter from The Economist" sounds more like a headline that would appear in The Economist than "Style Guide"
I eat their dog food
Mocks Populi
There is a an apocryphal story in which your anonymous correspondent was on a small business jet somewhere between Davos and Dubai, when he asked a former Thatcher minister what shade of pink the Financial Times newspaper was. "Parlour," the minister replied. It is in the spirit of this self-referential anecdote that an auspicious news peg has provided an opportunity to sound off on a pet saw and perhaps let on that I went to Cambridge.
Broadly, this newspaper is neither here nor there on a given issue, other than to say that it is different from what you expect - and for reasons that may surprise you. The prediction will be driven by the available data, include a smirk at the newcomer, and give a sop to the status quo. All things equal, it will predict outcomes that are some function of the sum of elements by the number of elements, and provide a view that is "radically centerist," if perhaps a bit smug. A reversion to the mean, indeed.
-- Every Economist Article Ever