Hacker News

Top stories

Live mirror
30 storiesupdated just nowView source snapshot
  1. San Francisco Onion Futures Company(onionfutures.com ↗)
    17comments
  2. Android 17 is the first since 3.x to add new APIs without releasing to the AOSP(grapheneos.social ↗)
    338comments
  3. Science Is Open Software(jepedersen.dk ↗)
    15comments
  4. Show HN: Seal – Letters and passwords that open for your family after you die(github.com/jasonepage ↗)
    1comments
  5. SDCC – Small Device C Compiler(sourceforge.net ↗)
    8comments
  6. Cloudflare Quick Tunnels(cloudflare.com ↗)
    268comments
  7. Typesafe-computer-use drives a Mac toward a goal for 1/50th of a cent per step(github.com/awlevin ↗)
    3comments
  8. Saving another 100TB of RAM(cloudflare.com ↗)
    58comments
  9. How OpenAI Used Its Own LLMs to Design Its Jalapeño Chip(ieee.org ↗)
    70comments
  10. NASA-IBM Lunar Foundation open-Source Geospatial AI Model(usra.edu ↗)
    discuss
  11. How to Write with an LLM(sockpuppet.org ↗)
    305comments
  12. Why building a Rust LSP is hard(rust-glancer.github.io ↗)
    12comments
  13. Xcode 27.1 Beta Release Notes(developer.apple.com ↗)
    75comments
  14. The first new cat species discovered in 100 years(nationalgeographic.com ↗)
    81comments
  15. Show HN: Cactus Needle 3: 8-29MB automation models can match DeepSeek V4 Flash(cactuscompute.com ↗)
    81comments
  16. Photon-Emission-Guided Laser Fault Injection Enables RP2350 Secure Debug(ledger.com ↗)
    61comments
  17. OpenJev(openjev.com ↗)
    250comments
  18. Goroutine Leak Profiles(go.dev ↗)
    1comments
  19. Harm Laundering in GPT Models: Gender Discrimination Transformed Rather Than(arxiv.org ↗)
    discuss
  20. The Farnese letter(simonklee.dk ↗)
    5comments
  21. Cache-to-Cache: Direct Semantic Communication Between LLMs (2025)(arxiv.org ↗)
    12comments
  22. Minimal Phone 2(minimalcompany.com ↗)
    200comments
  23. Cyclomatic Complexity in C#(ndepend.com ↗)
    16comments
  24. Claude Code now reads AGENTS.md if there is no Claude.md(claude.com ↗)
    208comments
  25. LispBM is a concurrent Lisp for microcontrollers with message passing(lispbm.com ↗)
    3comments
  26. Alibaba open-sources AI model that can detect cancer and nearly 150 conditions(scmp.com ↗)
    10comments
  27. Show HN: LiveWorld – Every 24/7 YouTube live camera on one globe(liveworld.info ↗)
    32comments
  28. Flock Offers Employees Buyouts as Customers Flee(wired.com ↗)
    4comments
  29. Warez: The Infrastructure and Aesthetics of Piracy (2021)(archive.org ↗)
    40comments
  30. Inside ZCode: Silently uploading your Git history to the cloud(ferstar.org ↗)
    95comments

Ask HN: Is there any way to get GMail to lighten up on the SPAM filtering?

5 pointsby 7y ago
7 comments
I was checking my SPAM folder in GSuite today and I noticed a decent number of messages that don't belong there. For example:

https://imgur.com/a/nzkMNDS

The message from Facebook in the screenshots is about as technically good as you can get AFAIK. It passes SPF (hard fail record), DKIM, and DMARC (reject policy). Is there a way I can tell GMail / GSuite that I don't want it to ever SPAM filter email that passes all those checks?

I understand SPAM filtering is hard, but I don't think there should be any question about messages from high value domains like facebookmail.com.

7y agoHN ↗

Related, a description of the problem, but not a solution:

* Google Is Eating Our Mail

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19756125

My personal mail server has all the industry-standard SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records. But Google still randomly eats my mail, and the system gives no explanation, sometimes it was my kernel patches submitted to the Linux maintainers, yikes! Weeks of time wasted.

7y agoHN ↗

The filtering is schizophrenic. Sometimes I think it's because normal users are incorrectly flagging stuff as spam, but I can't understand the one I posted. I don't think anyone is signing up for CT Log notifications and then flagging them as spam. It must be a poor quality algorithm somewhere that's flagging it.

7y agoHN ↗

It's understandable to flag mails from reputation domains as spams if there's no SPF and DMARC, but there is. It's totally unreasonable.

The filtering is schizophrenic.

The unfortunate result of machine learning? I guess Google's spam filter has lots of pattern-matching and heuristics that don't follow "the rules of E-mails" exactly. Anecdotes in the comments I linked says Google's spam filter has became more aggressive in recent years, I suspect it must be ML.

I hope other HN readers can give a more informative answer to your post, as a sender, I'm having the same problem, it's two sides of the same coin...

7y agoHN ↗

I just read through the comment section of this article and, as someone who is planning to host my own email, it is really demotivating me.

Do you (or anyone) happen to know how the big players (AWS SES, SendGrid, Mandrill etc) work around this issue? I understand they offer dedicated IP address, but I suppose a considerable amount of their emails goes through the "shared pool".

Maybe a high volume of sends actually helps?

7y agoHN ↗

I believe they are simply "too big to fail". If you start blocking AWS, lots of people will have problems with Google. As a result, mail sending services are unlikely to be flagged.

as someone who is planning to host my own email, it is really demotivating me.

The good thing is, I've hosted emails on my personal server for 4 years or so, and I don't have any issue so far, as long as it's not Google, but it's probably not so assuring to you because of this exact reason...

7y agoHN ↗

Funnily enough, cert issuance notifications (not Let's Encrypt) and infos about upcoming maintenance from my hosting provider are pretty much the only things that end up in my GMail spam folder, too. I have serious doubt that many people flag "here's your cert" emails as spam, and you have to sign up for the maintenance emails, so I suspect it's mostly about "this email looks similar to many other emails".

I've marked them "not spam" many times, but they ignore that completely.

7y agoHN ↗

This can also happen with shared email providers or email servers on shared IPs. If someone else is sending spam from that IP, you can get canned too