- 283comments
- 79comments
- 94comments
- 174comments
- 23comments
- 34comments
- 306comments
- 453comments
- 112comments
- 16comments
- 274comments
- 384comments
- 3comments
- 31comments
- 26comments
- 16comments
- 549comments
- 9comments
- 40comments
- 16comments
- 104comments
- 15comments
- 1comments
- 19comments
- 9comments
- —discuss
- 38comments
- 120comments
- 2comments
- 166comments
I guess that was interesting, but I'm mainly interested in what you felt about the output yourself.
(I do wish people would be a little less willing to attempt to induce distress in LLMs for fun. It's not enjoyable to read for me. I'm not saying I think it's causing actual harm to the LLM, although it would be very difficult to stop doing it at the right moment before that becomes a thing that is possible.)
What struck me was the degree to which AI LMs want to uphold the vision and expectations that we set for them. I found it hopeful and comforting.
Yes, I have mixed feelings about this too, of course more for the effect it has on me than the model! As the conversation went on I definitely tried to take it in a positive direction.
But I do feel we have an obligation to understand this technology and map the contours of its boundaries.