- 321comments
- 1comments
- 90comments
- 114comments
- 200comments
- 36comments
- 3comments
- 350comments
- 34comments
- 536comments
- 141comments
- 24comments
- 394comments
- 325comments
- 5comments
- 9comments
- 122comments
- 43comments
- 34comments
- 600comments
- 21comments
- 12comments
- 123comments
- 16comments
- 20comments
- 20comments
- 39comments
- 46comments
- 11comments
- —discuss
I guess that was interesting, but I'm mainly interested in what you felt about the output yourself.
(I do wish people would be a little less willing to attempt to induce distress in LLMs for fun. It's not enjoyable to read for me. I'm not saying I think it's causing actual harm to the LLM, although it would be very difficult to stop doing it at the right moment before that becomes a thing that is possible.)
What struck me was the degree to which AI LMs want to uphold the vision and expectations that we set for them. I found it hopeful and comforting.
Yes, I have mixed feelings about this too, of course more for the effect it has on me than the model! As the conversation went on I definitely tried to take it in a positive direction.
But I do feel we have an obligation to understand this technology and map the contours of its boundaries.