- 122comments
- 231comments
- 22comments
- 66comments
- 16comments
- 164comments
- 37comments
- 418comments
- 3comments
- 77comments
- 67comments
- 9comments
- 5comments
- 185comments
- 151comments
- 2comments
- —discuss
- 121comments
- 1comments
- —discuss
- 25comments
- 82comments
- 139comments
- 150comments
- 55comments
- 17comments
- 28comments
- 19comments
- 437comments
- 23comments
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41356528
I thought it was an awesome lecture and still quit relevant.
Direct link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW7ZHpKuqZg
That’s part 2
Part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si9iqF5uTFk
[dupe]
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41356528
[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41422752
SCNR
A different article about the same subject is not automatically a dupe. You are overdoing it quite a bit.
HN's standard is that an article should provide significant new information to not count as a duplicate:
<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10541340>
Since the Ars link only references the same talk, and provides only generally-available biographical background on Hopper herself, I'd say the dupe flag is warranted.
"NSA releases 1982 Grace Hopper lecture" (2024-08-26) 227 comments:
<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41356528>