- 136comments
- 33comments
- 235comments
- 28comments
- 66comments
- 25comments
- 7comments
- 231comments
- 39comments
- 432comments
- 5comments
- 67comments
- 83comments
- 3comments
- 188comments
- 2comments
- 11comments
- 2comments
- 166comments
- 155comments
- 132comments
- 154comments
- 84comments
- 30comments
- 56comments
- 23comments
- 28comments
- 2comments
- 457comments
- —discuss
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41356528
I thought it was an awesome lecture and still quit relevant.
Direct link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW7ZHpKuqZg
That’s part 2
Part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si9iqF5uTFk
[dupe]
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41356528
[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41422752
SCNR
A different article about the same subject is not automatically a dupe. You are overdoing it quite a bit.
HN's standard is that an article should provide significant new information to not count as a duplicate:
<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10541340>
Since the Ars link only references the same talk, and provides only generally-available biographical background on Hopper herself, I'd say the dupe flag is warranted.
"NSA releases 1982 Grace Hopper lecture" (2024-08-26) 227 comments:
<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41356528>