- 115comments
- 224comments
- 21comments
- 61comments
- 8comments
- 36comments
- 401comments
- 73comments
- —discuss
- 2comments
- 66comments
- 108comments
- 6comments
- 168comments
- 178comments
- —discuss
- —discuss
- 140comments
- 106comments
- 144comments
- 1comments
- 81comments
- 21comments
- 48comments
- 112comments
- 14comments
- 27comments
- 19comments
- 21comments
- 427comments
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41356528
I thought it was an awesome lecture and still quit relevant.
Direct link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW7ZHpKuqZg
That’s part 2
Part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si9iqF5uTFk
[dupe]
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41356528
[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41422752
SCNR
A different article about the same subject is not automatically a dupe. You are overdoing it quite a bit.
HN's standard is that an article should provide significant new information to not count as a duplicate:
<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10541340>
Since the Ars link only references the same talk, and provides only generally-available biographical background on Hopper herself, I'd say the dupe flag is warranted.
"NSA releases 1982 Grace Hopper lecture" (2024-08-26) 227 comments:
<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41356528>