- 111comments
- 61comments
- 66comments
- 438comments
- 15comments
- 216comments
- 5comments
- 237comments
- 1comments
- —discuss
- 24comments
- 22comments
- 326comments
- 80comments
- 61comments
- 150comments
- —discuss
- 301comments
- 5comments
- 20comments
- 394comments
- 16comments
- 93comments
- 226comments
- 43comments
- 26comments
- 1comments
- 172comments
- 443comments
- 150comments
An article named “This is how we do modern frequentist statistics” is an excerpt from a book called “Bayesian workflows”
Where is the article explaining that?
Anyway, great article, thanks for sharing.
From your description, I thought “wait, is this going to be Andrew Gelman?”
It is.
(For context: https://youtu.be/ZmbrsbYwRWw )
Wait a bayesian advocate using a frequentist approach and not having a fight over which branch is supreme. What's happening with the world. I guess all stats united against AI.
Gelman (2018, and reiterated 2024): "Bayesians are frequentists." (https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2018/06/17/bayesians-...)