Hacker News

Top stories

Live mirror
30 storiesupdated just nowView source snapshot
  1. Laya the open source version of Jev(convaiinnovations.com ↗)
    145comments
  2. A graphical desktop for the ZX Spectrum(github.com/mindbox77 ↗)
    56comments
  3. AI-generated posters don’t have to be horrible(john.hartnup.uk ↗)
    478comments
  4. Human brain is two separate organs, Stanford Medicine-led research finds(stanford.edu ↗)
    186comments
  5. Tin: full-text search for Postgres(planetscale.com ↗)
    45comments
  6. Asking Authors About Their Own Papers(medium.com/tmlrorg ↗)
    40comments
  7. Supabase (YC S20) Is Hiring for OrioleDB(supabase.link ↗)
    discuss
  8. “The Secret Life of Circuits” is here(coredump.cx ↗)
    52comments
  9. Black Holes or Black Hole Stars? Astronomers Spar over 'Little Red Dots'(quantamagazine.org ↗)
    16comments
  10. Android 17 is the first since 3.x to add new APIs without releasing to the AOSP(grapheneos.social ↗)
    555comments
  11. I built the fastest PHP webserver in the world(qbixserver.com ↗)
    37comments
  12. GPT-6 Astra Solves a WWI German Radio Cipher(prinzai.com ↗)
    134comments
  13. New evidence for hidden chambers beyond Tutankhamun's tomb(nature.com ↗)
    7comments
  14. San Francisco Onion Futures Company(onionfutures.com ↗)
    118comments
  15. What Zig felt like, coming from Rust(besok.github.io ↗)
    115comments
  16. Almost Never Use AI to Write Anything Substantive(erichgrunewald.substack.com ↗)
    discuss
  17. If math is more than proof, we need to better celebrate the rest of it(terrytao.wordpress.com ↗)
    193comments
  18. Agreement between the USA and Denmark (1951,2004) [pdf](state.gov ↗)
    28comments
  19. Cloudflare Quick Tunnels(cloudflare.com ↗)
    301comments
  20. How to Write with an LLM(sockpuppet.org ↗)
    361comments
  21. You can run Git on object storage if you re-make packfiles(tigrisdata.com ↗)
    24comments
  22. Saving another 100TB of RAM(cloudflare.com ↗)
    91comments
  23. Communication by means of modulated Johnson noise(pnas.org ↗)
    19comments
  24. SDCC – Small Device C Compiler(sourceforge.net ↗)
    23comments
  25. Science Is Open Software(jepedersen.dk ↗)
    51comments
  26. Ray Ozzie and the Optimism of Being Early(reproof.app ↗)
    13comments
  27. The first new cat species discovered in 100 years(nationalgeographic.com ↗)
    124comments
  28. Ctenophores: Wonders of Biology(quantamagazine.org ↗)
    9comments
  29. OpenJev(openjev.com ↗)
    280comments
  30. Why building a Rust LSP is hard(rust-glancer.github.io ↗)
    47comments

“The Secret Life of Circuits” is here

198 pointsby 3d agoblog.coredump.cx
52 comments
3d agoHN ↗

I looked at sample chapter, the fonts and layout are visually repulsive.

7h agoHN ↗

This made me have a look and I do like it a lot.

The wide margins remind me of university coursebooks.

6h agoHN ↗

The wide margins remind me of university coursebooks.

What I want is a paperback where the margins are chosen such that you can read the text when you fold back the facing part of the book.

7h agoHN ↗

Sir, you have a knack for inspiring commentary: the exact opposite of damning with faint praise! Also 0% slop it made me pre-order the book immediately.

6h agoHN ↗

That would (of course) be praising with faint damnation.

(Or is it praising with generous damnation?)

1h agoHN ↗

It can get hard to follow after a while :)

How about a triple-play, damning with damn damnation?

5h agoHN ↗

Congratulations, you are now quoted on the page!

3d agoHN ↗

This is a much better introduction to circuits than most. You actually get a bit of depth rather than a cookbook of "do this to get that" sort of prose.

7h agoHN ↗

That’s also what I really like about “Practical Electronics for Inventors”, the authors explains the underlying physics for each component. Though the theory chapter can be heavy if you want to follow everything. “Secrets Life of Circuits” seems to be a bit more approachable

6h agoHN ↗

I'm hoping you're right. I enthusiastically bought PEFI but found it to be way over my head. I'm eager to get SLOC because I'm hoping it can be sort of a bridge between my "MAKE: Electronics" book and PEFI.

5h agoHN ↗

PEFI/PE4I as a technical reference when you need details about a specific topic, SLOC as an overall introduction to give a good intuition, and M:E for more practical project tutorials, if that’s what we (hobbyists without any formal training) end up with that would be awesome :)

AlphaPhoenix YouTube channel is also a great source of information to clarify theoretical topics. I find it very helpful to just see how he think about electricity in his various projects: https://youtu.be/X_crwFuPht4. And his enthusiasm is contagious!

One personal note: as someone coming from software I find learning electronics pretty hard as it requires a completely different mental model and way to approach systems. Took me years of various failed attempts to finally internalize I have to stop relying on metaphors and shortcuts, and instead understand the actual physics at play to develop an intuition that makes sense. That looks daunting and I thought I would hate that part but in fact after pushing through the first weeks it becomes really satisfying! Accept things take time and that you will be uncomfortable for a while, and move at your own pace. And here LLMs are actually really helpful to clarify topics you’re not sure you understand fully, once you start to learn the terminology (I use instructions that makes it clear they shouldn’t solve things for me and instead evaluate my understanding)

5h agoHN ↗

as someone coming from software I find learning electronics pretty hard as it requires a completely different mental model and way to approach systems

I went from electronics to software and one thing that has puzzled me is how much people dislike reading docs as in reference manuals. People can get by with sloppy code full of hidden bugs and when those bugs arise they’re like deers frozen by headlights.

Imagine building a circuit without any ideas how it operates. I’ve encountered web devs that don’t understand how http works.

4h agoHN ↗

Also as a person who came to Embedded/Electronics from the Software side, i found the following incredibly useful to bridge the software-hardware gap using MCUs;

1) Introduction to Embedded Systems: Using Microcontrollers and the MSP430 by Manuel Jiménez, Rogelio Palomera, Isidoro Couvertier - https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4614-3143-5

This has more of a hardware interfacing slant than most books on embedded systems which is what a software person needs. Every topic is first introduced in a general way with lots of illustrations and then its application in MSP430 is shown. Hence we can easily transfer our understanding to any other MCU family. A really good textbook for serious students of embedded electronics.

3h agoHN ↗

I like Elicia White’s Making Embedded Systems because it covers a lot of practical stuff like how to read a datasheet. It’s a good book for existing programmers.

A lot of electronic books struggle to find balance between super easy projects, very specific cookbook recipes or a laundry list of components.

4h agoHN ↗

I respectfully disagree.

I'm not sure who exactly this book is for, but it's certainly not for absolute beginners. There is a huge delta between the target audience and the level of understanding and experience someone not knowing a first thing about electronics would typically have.

I can clearly remember sitting there reading about component parasitics, without even having a clear idea how an ideal component behaves, and so on. I was just lacking buckets of context, and it was a painful read with lots of assumptions about the reader's background.

On the other hand, I still think it is a great book, like pretty much everything else from NoStarch. I just disagree on it being suitable as a first book in electronics.

That said, I'm looking forward to the day when I will be on an adequate enough level to read it again -- this time, in its entirety.

7h agoHN ↗

Super looking forward to it. Got it on preorder in Europe! Will still be a bit of a waiting time.

Always enjoy reading the blog posts, and this seems like a great way to support work that gives me joy. Who knows, might start picking up actual electronics as side projects. Hardware work seems like such a great way to get code into the physical world.

7h agoHN ↗

The artwork on the cover should come with a health and safety notice :D

7h agoHN ↗

I like the pop art style. But what is she going to do with that soldering iron - stick it up her nose?

7h agoHN ↗

Maybe it should look like someone in a Western movie blowing smoke from a pistol?

6h agoHN ↗

Like the best art, it's left up to the viewer to decide!

2h agoHN ↗

That alone makes me think it was drawn by AI. They say it's not...but that iconic pic sits directly in the uncanny valley.

1h agoHN ↗

Sshh. Her lips are sealed.

It's just a stylistic thing, same with the smoke, which represents heat more so than fumes.

Normally you hold the iron horizontal under the nose and of course don't breathe during the heat test.

And you don't actually kiss the soldering iron until it's cooled all the way down, and usually not unless the experimental circuit you came up with works the first time you plug it in :) So you can relax as intended and unplug the damn iron, without having to keep on hammering til all hours.

One thing she's not telling is the way you should be effective enough soldering using (very inexpensive) uncontrolled soldering irons, that you can eventually solder two pieces of solder together. Before you graduate to a "pro-grade" soldering station.

1h agoHN ↗

It is clearly a reference to a smoking gun. I think the cover is beautiful.

7h agoHN ↗

Just ordered. Love these kinds of books. Any others like this one people are aware of?

7h agoHN ↗

Pre-ordered mine(hardback). Yeesh....I have no impulse control because this looks like so much fun,

7h agoHN ↗

I like the 'certified clank free' logo. It that a standard thing now?

1h agoHN ↗

The barrage of "X not Y" almost made me think that this was AI-generated. But I guess some people just talk like that.

1h agoHN ↗

I just read a Quanta article from 2015 and literally had to check the date after the third "X not Y" I encountered. But the models have learned that from somewhere, too.

42m agoHN ↗

Why do you think AI "talks" like that? It is pervasive in a lot oof the training material.

Most people writing scientific literature are not English majors nor even great communicators, their primary competencies are elsewhere. Expecting everyone to write literature is just odd & reductive.

Yes, it helps to be a good writer, but the primary objective for science papers is to convey information; that it is well written or enjoyable is a nice bonus but not essential.

6h agoHN ↗

Michał Zalewski (the author of this book) is goated. His book Silence on the Wire was very inspiring to me and the techniques he described often come to my mind years after reading the book

6h agoHN ↗

This thing is a tome. And I like it like that. Functions as a nerdy coffee table book when not in use.

5h agoHN ↗

It would be nice to see a similar book devoted to sensors. Anyone have recommendations?

5h agoHN ↗

PE4I (“Practical Electronics for Inventors”) has a whole chapter dedicated to sensors

5h agoHN ↗

If you're ordering from Europe, be sure to check if it's available in your local Amazon page first, I almost got slapped with like a 50% shipping/import charges because I went straight to the main link (the US amazon). The ones that have it are listed in the blog post.

4h agoHN ↗

I find it crazy that Amazon haven't implemented a feature that will take you to the same product in your local store easily. I had the same issue and had to go find it manually.

1h agoHN ↗

one cool feature amazon implements is that if you change the .com for .es (and nothing else) for a product link it will do exactly that. I know it is not automatic but it works.

4h agoHN ↗

Got mine. And I'm a former EE. Looking forward to it, maybe inspire my daughter a bit.

2h agoHN ↗

This looks like it’ll be a good book for me to learn more about electrical theory and circuit design, I know a bit about AC and DC electricity from working in electrical construction which should help me dive right in, thanks for sharing this book release!

2h agoHN ↗

It gives real answers but doesn’t demand a year of calculus beforehand.

Oh yes, these kinds of shortcuts have always worked great.

50m agoHN ↗

Ha, Ha, True.

That was a silly statement by the author; just say that this is "less theoretical" and not a textbook.

Looked at the contents/sample chapter and it seems just like many of the books published by make magazine.

37m agoHN ↗

My objective has often been to build & test as many experimental circuits as I could in the shortest amount of time.

One of the real good shortcuts is to just start soldering parts together according to a plan in your head, without taking the time to make a schematic drawing beforehand or do any advanced calculations.

There might be more emphasis on the properties and ratings of each component this way, this is not something to skip over, you should be very familiar with each component you use. Well in advance, and loads of hours of component study needs to be behind you, otherwise you may not do too good at just whipping something up on the bench that's electrically sound to begin with.

As pointed out, with math it can be the same way.

If you just want to quickly start picking up parts and soldering them together right away without doing any advanced calculations, the best shortcut is to have already become quite familiar with the equations including calculus when necessary, so you can bring to bear endless hours of mathematical study and use it to intuitively guide your soldering iron for every hour at the bench.

Edit: upvoted because your message should not be less than neutral, not greyed out at all. Obviously, I'm on the fence, sometimes I use math, other times not at all ;)

2h agoHN ↗

I see some discussion of which books are good for people with various levels of electronics knowledge. I'd like to add one that I've never seen mentioned here: Agarwal and Lang's "Foundations of Analog and Digital Electronics".

This was the book used by MIT in 2007 for the first course in the EE and CS programs. It is that year's course that is on their Open Courseware platform [1], and the readings list there links to a full PDF of the book.

(Edit: click the book title on the readings page, not the "View e-book version" link. See my response to groos' comment below for details).

This is not a link to a pirated copy BTW. Agarwal is a pioneer in the open-education movement and the authors intentionally arranged for an open access PDF.

The lecture videos on Open Courseware are very good too.

[1] https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/6-002-circuits-and-electronics-s...

2h agoHN ↗

The PDF no longer appears to be there or at least is well hidden.

1h agoHN ↗

Oh, I see the problem. You clicked the "View e-book version" link. That goes to the publisher's store. As far as I know they never had a PDF, just a special web version.

Click the book's title in the paragraph above that, where it says this:

Agarwal, Anant, and Jeffrey H. Lang. Foundations of Analog and Digital Electronic Circuits. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Elsevier, July 2005. ISBN: 9781558607354.

That takes you to a PDF.

Sorry for not being more specific. I didn't even notice the "View e-book version" as I only went to the site to remind myself of the name of the book, saw the title was a link, and clicked it. Then I thought "Why is MIT linking to a pirate copy of a book from one of their own professors?", and did a little Googling to get some backstory.

1h agoHN ↗

Already purchased, looking forward to getting it!!!

1h agoHN ↗

A couple clicks through to older lcamtuf posts and I came across this in the "what is electricity" post:

Once again, we don’t have a satisfying explanation why. We know that these quantum numbers correspond to standing-wave solutions of a three-dimensional wave function that we pulled out of thin air. We also know that the model works better than any alternatives. But we don’t know what any of it really means — or if it means anything.

It is so refreshing to see this explicated thus; physics textbooks are generally coy about "know this for now, and there will be deeper insights available later" but they typically never level with readers and say "we don't know".

1h agoHN ↗

Oddly enough, one of my upper level math textbooks (maybe real analysis, don't remember) said the same thing about the definition of a set, except that "later" meant graduate school.