- 363comments
- 78comments
- 156comments
- 29comments
- 138comments
- 50comments
- 198comments
- 7comments
- 3comments
- 35comments
- 21comments
- 124comments
- 2comments
- 40comments
- 34comments
- 19comments
- 23comments
- 313comments
- 106comments
- 56comments
- 182comments
- 345comments
- 36comments
- 5comments
- —discuss
- 19comments
- 25comments
- 51comments
- 3comments
- 103comments
I lived in Dallas for three years, and yet somehow I had never heard of this place until I saw the LGR video about it closing, at which point I had run away to NYC
Kind of sad, I think I would have very much enjoyed the place if I had known about it.
Brings back memories of the computer show underneath the highway in Dallas.
This is the part that struck me: "According to the local government’s property records, the building was worth $1.6 million for tax purposes. The tax liability on the property was $46,000 a year."
Do I read this right that the owner of that building would be owing 2.875% tax per year on the market value of the building?
Because that would be in line with what I hear about US property tax and seems insane to me. At that rate you're not owning anything, you're renting. At that rate that's not the land of the free, that's a lifetime of indentured servitude.