This entire article is complete AI generated slop.

Hundreds of em-dashes to count, Claudisms, and known AI patterns that you can check for yourself on Pangram. For example 100% dead giveaways:

> "Jev is a data point, not a dependency".

> "This is where being early stops being a liability."

> "The specific danger of a bet like ours is not being wrong. It is being right in a year when the market has not shown up yet"

I can’t read this. I tend to still think that things are human written, but it feels like everything is too long these days. I find myself skimming everything. It’s the lemon problem but for literature.