A government needs to buy the right to have these cameras and the currency is trust. You can complaint about the way people behave, they deserve it! Won't change anything tho.
How would you feel if they put cameras in your home? I know it sounds absurd but in some places landlord CCTV is gaining more and more terrain.
A government needs to buy the right to have these cameras and the currency is trust.
These individuals destroying cameras, instead of using force to try and impose their will (to no avail), should support candidates that favor the policies they want.
We (supposedly) live in a society. Society is not possible if crime is tolerated.
Right, let's just ignore multiple instances of city councils receiving hours of impassioned speeches from constituents then unanimously voting against the will of the people.
They are destroying others' property, which is as immoral as it gets.
The basics: Do not kill, do not steal, do not destroy.
This is behavior worse than that of rabid animals. It should be treated accordingly.
A government needs to buy the right to have these cameras and the currency is trust. You can complaint about the way people behave, they deserve it! Won't change anything tho.
How would you feel if they put cameras in your home? I know it sounds absurd but in some places landlord CCTV is gaining more and more terrain.
These individuals destroying cameras, instead of using force to try and impose their will (to no avail), should support candidates that favor the policies they want.
We (supposedly) live in a society. Society is not possible if crime is tolerated.
Right, let's just ignore multiple instances of city councils receiving hours of impassioned speeches from constituents then unanimously voting against the will of the people.
The implication is that the only solutions are autocracy and anarchy. The "destroy the cameras" path.
I'd rather we just elect better city councils.
Whos property?