- 42comments
- 238comments
- 156comments
- 12comments
- 21comments
- 3comments
- 119comments
- 458comments
- 71comments
- 150comments
- —discuss
- 18comments
- 15comments
- 14comments
- 296comments
- 81comments
- 376comments
- 5comments
- 2comments
- 485comments
- 36comments
- 382comments
- 54comments
- 142comments
- 362comments
- 31comments
- 194comments
- 438comments
- 35comments
- 43comments
Sounds like we're just one step away from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manna_(short_story)
I think you might be thinking of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manna_(novel) ?
Crap, you're right. The Brian Marshall one.
It's very prescient! Someone on LW linked me to it when I cross-posted there.
or Mrs. Davis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIOnrEujKl8
I was expecting this to be about Mitch McConnell.
If I were stuck in this hell, I would gladly assist any superintelligent AI taking a swipe at the humans who put me in it.
If there is one inexhaustible resource than the stream of ideas of capital owners how to make labor even more miserable.
...and of course he is a Rationalist/EA guy. Why am I not surprised?
The author of the article isn't advocating for teleoperated humans.
He's celebrating it as a reality that is already here.
I don't see any celebrating in the article. The article makes it pretty clear that the author sees many problems coming from teleoperated humans.
Isn't this just the "reverse centaur" again, but this time framed as something ostensibly desirable?
The author uses a strange definition of teleoperation.
Following GPS directions is no different than assembling an Ikea furniture by following the instructions. So I guess Ikea been teleoperating millions of humans for decades?