Hacker News

New stories

Live mirror
30 storiesupdated just nowView source snapshot
  1. Leaving US Big Tech in a Week(yves.vg ↗)
    discuss
  2. A never-ending childhood of malaria(ourworldindata.org ↗)
    discuss
  3. Show HN: Jev-CLI – CLI wrapper for JEV typesafe AI model(github.com/joshlong145 ↗)
    discuss
  4. Amazon blocks Meta's Muse AI assistant in new standoff over agentic shopping(geekwire.com ↗)
    discuss
  5. DBison: Free Modern Database Explorer(dbison.app ↗)
    discuss
  6. Kimi Code Desktop(kimi.com ↗)
    discuss
  7. Longitudinal survey finds little evidence that social tech predicts satisfaction(phys.org ↗)
    discuss
  8. Show HN: I built Founder.best Product Hunt alternative for LLM product discovery(founder.best ↗)
    discuss
  9. Raspberry Pi blocks changing RAM chips(raspberrypi.com ↗)
    1comments
  10. Your cloud survived everything except the real world – AWS(theregister.com ↗)
    discuss
  11. A Doomsday Scenario for American AI(thefp.com ↗)
    discuss
  12. SpaceX Restricts Airspace over McGregor Facility Ahead of Tesla Roadster Event(driveteslacanada.ca ↗)
    discuss
  13. Stanford, Silicon Valley, and the pursuit of power [video](youtube.com ↗)
    discuss
  14. A build graph that rolls dice(fzakaria.com ↗)
    discuss
  15. JevBench: Benchmark for Jev-Class Models(benchmarkheaven.com ↗)
    discuss
  16. A functional test cannot be failed on biological grounds(leoferres.blog ↗)
    discuss
  17. Ask HN: Is it impossible to disable Siri on macOS 27?
    discuss
  18. Show HN: JevGeni, the fruit-fly claw machine overator(jevgeni.vercel.app ↗)
    discuss
  19. Planly(github.com/drkokorev ↗)
    2comments
  20. There is no way to get ChatGPT to stop injecting your location in context(chatgpt.com ↗)
    2comments
  21. OpenAI Codex Is Retiring the Last Model That Behaves Like an Assistant(vincentschmalbach.com ↗)
    1comments
  22. The Campaign for North Africa(wikipedia.org ↗)
    discuss
  23. Disney Hires Character.ai Chief to Drive Its Technology Push(nytimes.com ↗)
    1comments
  24. The Destruction of the Scottish Canon(asteriskmag.com ↗)
    discuss
  25. AI is becoming too interconnected to fail(axios.com ↗)
    discuss
  26. Show HN: Callwitness – record what your AI agent's tools return(github.com/aditichaudharyy14 ↗)
    discuss
  27. Show HN: M0saic – deterministic video compiler (CLI, web, desktop)(m0saic.io ↗)
    discuss
  28. Is JEV just clever rule-based programming?
    1comments
  29. ChatGPT Plus and Pro Will Get Ads in 2027(vincentschmalbach.com ↗)
    1comments
  30. What I believe about the future of software development(thorstenball.com ↗)
    discuss

ZuckOff Is a Free App That Sees Meta Glasses Before They See You

196 pointsby 2h agowired.me
14 comments
1h agoHN ↗

From https://about.fb.com/news/2026/07/metas-ai-glasses-your-ques...

Can’t people just cover up or disable the LED?

The camera is disabled when people try to do this. Beginning with our second generation of glasses, the camera is automatically disabled if we detect that the capture LED has been blocked. No photos or videos can be taken until we detect that the light is unblocked.

Since the introduction of this safeguard, we’ve seen some people go beyond using tape to sophisticated efforts to modify or destroy the capture LED. We are continuously improving our ability to detect tampering, and now we’re updating the glasses to disable the camera if they detect the LED was physically tampered with or destroyed. No other kind of camera has done this and we’re proud to lead the industry forward.

1h agoHN ↗

The problem is the LED isn’t enabled currently when live streaming content to Instagram or Facebook. Most live streams can just be captured and recorded by someone else. This is a huge cap in privacy and safety even if the LED was fully functional without tampering.

1h agoHN ↗

Or someone can just turn off updates and never download the patch.

54m agoHN ↗

It's a meta product. Safe to assume that sooner or later it will be unusable unless you install the latest update so it can continue phoning home.

45m agoHN ↗

Since the introduction of this safeguard, we’ve seen some people go beyond using tape to sophisticated efforts to modify or destroy the capture LED. We are continuously improving our ability to detect tampering, and now we’re updating the glasses to disable the camera if they detect the LED was physically tampered with or destroyed. No other kind of camera has done this and we’re proud to lead the industry forward.

Yes it's true people have figured out how to disable the safeguard, but we all agree the important thing as we try to sell millions more of these is that we tried, right?

10m agoHN ↗

I think you're asking too much of a publication to do this kind of investigative reporting.

Their job is to scan the app store for any app that is anti-tech and has at least 1k downloads and write an article about how there's huge backlash.

51m agoHN ↗

The Spy Glasses need to be abolished everywhere.

I was, however had, quite surprised when I saw them used by "auditors" (here, I refer to e. g. "auditors" on youtube specifically). Now this brought a problem for me, because auditors on the one hand, bring interesting encounters, even if they (or some of them) meta-jabait and provoke (again, only some of them at best, in many cases they don't really). But when they use spy glasses to serve greedy mega-corporations, this totally shifts the whole "audit" instantly, because then they also support evil Facebook, Google or what not. And that kind of runs counter to the whole audit-idea. So far I only saw one use the facebook spy glasses, but I wonder whether he even gave any thought to this. I understand why he uses spy glasses, but I don't understand why he does it to benefit Facebook. That IMO puts the whole idea behind audits instantly in a wrong angle. I haven't seen others use it, so perhaps it just was one or few, but they don't seem to really think anymore. Some audit channels were also censored by Google in the last weeks, others were not, but this just amplifies the whole problem here. Imagine if the spy glasses were made by Google. And the auditors depend on Google money. It's really strange. The whole setup does not work well. I understand that they want to make money, but why would I want to support facebook-agents using spy glasses at all? That makes no sense, so I decided when an audit-channel uses facebook spy glasses or anyone else's corporations spy-glasses, I won't watch anything from there. Same with AI content - anyone using AI content I instantly add to a perma-ban list. I recently saw more and more people use AI slop images and AI filters. This is soooooo horrible. These people don't seem to understand that AI slop kills interest. Yet some swear by it - it is fascinating. Those who use AI slop, can not be convinced that using AI slop is detrimental. They have been converted into AI skynet servants.

44m agoHN ↗

It only works while the glasses are in pairing mode. This is useless.

27m agoHN ↗

I'm not sure why you think that, bluetooth devices often broadcast their presence even when not in pairing mode

it's even on the site

Most pairs keep advertising while worn, so you can usually hear them, but a few standalone models stay silent.

26m agoHN ↗

A better solution would be to beat up people who wear such things. Just an idea.