- 51comments
- 12comments
- 280comments
- 289comments
- 105comments
- 239comments
- 90comments
- 90comments
- 33comments
- 168comments
- 7comments
- 707comments
- 26comments
- —discuss
- 17comments
- 30comments
- 72comments
- 104comments
- 116comments
- 17comments
- 206comments
- 42comments
- 2comments
- 37comments
- 69comments
- —discuss
- 287comments
- 11comments
- 45comments
- 14comments
Any article on this topic is unsatisfactory if it lacks a color photo.
There is a color photo, but the rose isn't actually blue.
Not actually blue though is it? Kinda purple.
I would've called it "a sickly kind of purple"
Source article is better, and refers to them as “violet-blue roses” https://www.suntory.com/sic/story/20260911/
Are the scientists color blind? The rose is purple.
Bad translation, see the other top-level comment with the origin link that referes to them as violet-blue.