- 128comments
- 13comments
- 21comments
- 37comments
- 8comments
- 136comments
- 249comments
- 8comments
- 32comments
- 10comments
- 25comments
- 11comments
- 17comments
- 219comments
- 117comments
- 91comments
- 14comments
- 117comments
- 16comments
- 87comments
- 52comments
- 41comments
- 32comments
- 5comments
- 991comments
- 2comments
- 51comments
- 92comments
- 7comments
- 39comments
Just curious, how is this different from something like a PGP key server?
The same difference between Dropbox vs an FTP account.
Better than the eyeball-scanning ghouls.
atproto is currently permissionless world readable, that seems worse to most people (I asked low 100s) than being in a siloed platform with some amount of control over who can see their content
oh, maybe you mean Sam Altman's World with their eye scanning for identity, that is quite dystopian
Yes I was referring to Altman's "WorldCoin" eyeball-scanning scheme.
This might be one of the closest things I've seen to actually being able to own your account - instead of having it not just owned by a second party in every way that matters, but also beholden to a third party via an e-mail or a phone number you can't possibly own in any meaningful way.
That's pretty important in a world where the likes of Google can and will just reject your attempt to log in with a valid password on the grounds of "we don't like you", and force you to "confirm" yourself using a phone number that's defunct since 2009.
The issue is, as often is the case, adoption.
did:web is closer to owning your own identity, this is a central database controlled by an organization
The PLC makes it easy for Bluesky to be a custodian and onboard new users
How does this compare to Persona? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Persona