- 7comments
- 17comments
- 156comments
- 20comments
- 6comments
- 1comments
- 22comments
- 3comments
- 42comments
- 4comments
- 141comments
- 11comments
- 279comments
- 8comments
- 34comments
- 16comments
- 27comments
- 18comments
- 11comments
- 225comments
- 17comments
- 16comments
- 94comments
- 124comments
- 130comments
- 2comments
- 100comments
- 59comments
- 24comments
- 13comments
Is this really true? I’m suspicious for a few reasons:
1. If it were true, I expect it would be a national security concern, and quickly remedied
2. While there is a lot more dependence on electrical connections, there’s also many more sources of disturbance now. So I suspect some of the failure modes are tested by “normal” human activity
3. EMI is a known risk, in my previous job we actively tested and built for it. I suppose if the limits are inappropriately set , or if this sort of testing isn’t wide spread, it could still be an issue.
4. As long as there’s a neutral line, i think any common mode should be rejected, in which case this should be fine?