- 156comments
- 116comments
- 70comments
- 41comments
- 2comments
- 433comments
- 37comments
- 12comments
- 31comments
- 36comments
- 47comments
- 175comments
- 69comments
- 4comments
- 3comments
- 74comments
- 792comments
- 224comments
- 37comments
- 57comments
- 7comments
- 9comments
- 339comments
- 10comments
- 13comments
- 5comments
- 38comments
- 99comments
- 30comments
- 46comments
How does this compare to distrobox?
IS it LXC containers or docker? Or are you running a custom chroot namespace setup?
Haven't checked the actual project but he does state he uses systemd-nspawn. Which is it's own kind of container runtime.
He runs a systemd-nspawnd container in a "small vm", so neither really?
The project is cool, but please use human written text.
The website's Claudisms are unbearable.
This is most useful to people who run Linux as their daily driver so rather than saying its like WSL can you explain what it offers that existing Linux containers do not?
Its also sounds different from WSL which I thought is a VM rather than a container.
Something that also require a bit of explanation. What do you do that makes this such a common problem.
So you've just basically reimplemented LXC?
There's already Distrobox, which does exactly the same thing but isn't slop.