- 15comments
- 12comments
- 176comments
- 298comments
- 182comments
- 3comments
- 34comments
- 61comments
- 104comments
- 57comments
- 168comments
- —discuss
- 477comments
- 644comments
- 2comments
- 272comments
- 6comments
- 178comments
- 49comments
- 101comments
- 1comments
- 89comments
- 47comments
- —discuss
- 13comments
- 242comments
- 57comments
- 168comments
- 4comments
- 4comments
Brake lights that show intensity: check. I have read of at least 2 proof-of-concept implementations - one is two red bars plus a white bar (white bar should be instantly recognizable as "reverse") another goes circle->triangle (warning) -> large hexagon (stop!)
Update: I believe that some Mercedes models actually have brake lights that flash during strong braking. Google "adaptive brake lights" for more info.
Many recent european cars automatically flash warnings when braking strongly.
If I remember correctly BMWs have a high intensity brake light under emergency braking.
I'd be astonished if blinking braking lights were allowed in a country like Germany. I once read that a truck driver was fined in Germany because he had a small illuminated Christmas tree in his cockpit, by which he was breaking the specific part of their traffic laws that regulates vehicle lights. That must truly have felt like the most wonderful time of the year for that poor guy.
In Europe braking lights and turning lights are distinct and of different color (red vs orange). Many cars now flash the warnings (both turning lights together) when strongly braking, following a common usage among european motorists.
Yeah, at least here in Italy it's pretty common that if you have to slow down suddenly because the road is blocked (due to a traffic jam or whatever), you turn on the emergency blinking lights so the people behind you will be aware of the need to slow down and stop.
It's the same here in Slovenia and pretty much every other European country I've ever driven in.
Not so here in Norway. I've observed this behavior on several occasions when visiting Spain though.
I do this (Ontario, Canada), but I don't know if I've ever actually seen it done by anyone else. Our 400-series highways tend to have very good forward visibility, though—there isn't really such thing as a jam just over the crest of a hill.
401 exits can backfill right on to the actual highway though.
I do this in Ontario too, someone saved my life by doing this as I was entering the fog from around a corner and didn't have time to adjust my speed.
Well, it's even in France's law: if there is a strong slow down, you _must_ turn on blinking lights until the car following you does the same.
Strong braking normally == hazard lights + brake lights on new cars.
And will switch on their emergency blinkers after any sudden stops > 50 km / h to < 10.
My '05 BMW has 2 stage rear brake lights for regular braking and when ABS is triggered from hard braking or slippery conditions.
Why wouldn't a series of lights be the best/simplest pattern to implement this idea: [O O O ] == medium breaking intensity. etc..
I first saw motorcycle brake lights that flashed faster with the amount of braking at least 20 years ago in the US aftermarket.
I've seen them on the road maybe 20 times.
I've had a similar idea to the brakes, but in my version the intensity of light was linked to the intensity of the braking. That way if you're just cutting a few mph off your speed, it doesn't really matter and the light is pretty dim. If you're braking moderately, the light comes on bright enough to indicate that you're braking, but if you slam on the brakes then the light illuminates strongly and brightly.
Some braking strength indication standard should be established and mandated on new cars. This sort of thing is definitely needed in Houston. The frequency with which I have to panic stop in the middle of the freeway or other kind of high speed limited-access road is startling.
The general idea is good but the implementation is odd. It should be enough to do like the ipod/iphone, that pauses the music if you unplug the earphones. I don't know if it's a original idea by Apple, but I love it.
Yeah. I often take them out momentarily to talk to someone or do something and having to pull out the player and restart the track would be annoying.
Unless of course it detected when you put them back in and resumed.
well yeah, I'd say of course it would have to resume on re-insertion.
It's a great idea too, imo.
It's good but doesn't work exactly how I would like it to - if you are listening to something on headphones, plug the device into a docking station you get the audio out through the speakers but when you unplug the headphones the audio stops.
If you're going to talk to someone, the natural action would be to pull the buds out of your ear, rather than pull the lead out. This is why John's idea is different to (and probably better than) Apple's implementation (which is great).
It would even work for giving someone else the buds to hear a song you're listening to. Pauses while you hand them over.
Yeah, but I can't think of two similar actions where it would be difficult to define the expected behavior: sometimes you just take one bud out momentarily to be able to listen to something external and you don't really want the music to stop. The other one is common in teens, when they share one bud with a friend to listen to some track together and the music should be stopped while that bud is not put.
Both are solved by only pausing when both buds are removed (which is the most polite thing to do anyway).
There are companies out there making money selling paper and water. Having a great idea helps, but just creating something is the hardest part.
Selling it is more important than creating it.
I think having ideas is actually linked to writing them down.
If you write an idea down and think about it, you show your brain interest in ideas so you will get more ideas over time.
I think it's an essential habit, to write and think about your ideas, when you want to be more creative and have many ideas.
Then the value in actually realizing all your ideas, is much less than picking the good ones and realize them.
Ideas sparking ideas is the whole premise behind IDEO style brain storming. You get a handful of people to start thinking of ideas for whatever problem you want to solve and one idea always inspires more. Crazy ideas are encouraged since they might also lead to good, tangible ones.
Great post - but I kinda disagree that an idea can be bad.
A system that pauses music when you remove headphones would solve a problem, thus it's a good idea - it's just a small issue of the implementation.
Probably most of those 1000 ideas are not bad, but might be difficult or infeasible to implement.
RE: headphones - there could be many possible solutions to this - I think Casio makes a watch that activates the backlight when you raise you rist to look at the time - same technology.
RE: variable brake-lights, Didn't Donald Norman mention this in "The design of everyday things" ?
I have (and used) one of these wrist watches. Power hungry, may I say...
It may solve a problem, but it creates a new one. Before listening to my mp3 player on a train, I leave the buds out of my ears and hold them in front of me, to gauge volume so as to not annoy my fellow passengers.
This practice is rendered impossible by this proposed technology.
That said, as an idea, it isn't bad. However, I contend that the statement that ideas can't be bad, is wrong. The idea of eliminating all Jews, gays and Gypsies to fix Germany's economic problems strikes me as a pretty bad idea.
Put a fifteen second delay on it. Problem solved.
I have that habit too, actually, in the workplace for instance.
Point taken! Ok, ideas definately can be bad!
However I'm pretty sure the idea of ethnic cleansing and mass murder was conceived quite a lot earlier than the second world war...
I set my desktop to pause music when I lock the screen (and play again on unlock), it's really useful.
The number of ideas one has is a moot point really. More important is ability to discern quality. Most important is to bring the good ones to fruition!
How do you make it so neat? As soon as I write an idea, I start to iterate (generalizing, specifizing, implementing, MVP, MVImplementation, niches, copy, trying to find the essence of the idea, and how to express it). I'm not saying my way is better, since it's very difficult-impossible to later read as a reference. The only useful result is in my mind.
Actually, every one of hose ideas is a good one since they all speak to an underlying problem- that taking off your headphones means you miss your song, or that sudden braking leads to crashes. These ideas are only a quick proposed solution to the problem, but as anyone who has ever done a startup knows, it takes a long time to refine your product. So don't label these ideas as bad- I bet most of the problems they intended to solve still exist today.
Adaptive brake lights: http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ece549/spring10/team7/index.html
Currently licensed by Bosch and integrated into at least one test vehicle.
I like not writing my ideas down, because it acts as a simple filter.
If an idea is actually compelling, then it will stay with me even if I don't write it down (and I'll continue to think about it, expand upon it, tinker with it, etc.). If I don't remember it, then it probably wasn't that interesting to begin with.
A "bad", or perhaps more accurately "marginal" or "nifty but unprofitable" can still help the creative process leading to "good" ideas. The marginal one may end up as a feature of the killer app you build later, or the unprofitable one may see some future profit potential as other factors change.
I track all mine, good or bad, and when I'm feeling uninspired or burned out on what I'm working on, I like to go back and at least have a laugh at all the old ideas.
In-ear headphones that automatically pause music when removed.
Sony Ericsson has already implemented this! http://www.sonyericsson.com/putyourearsincontrol/
i write my ideas down, but mostly to get them out of my head. or, more accurately, less in my head. i am often 'distracted' / overwhelmed by them. putting them on paper (well, textedit to be precise) makes it easier for me to let go of them.
Like the post a lot. Don't think they are "bad" ideas. Worse ideas are successful every day.
Not exciting to say, but ideas are a small part of success. Or said another way, to implement one idea, you need 1000 good ideas.
The Sony MH907 ear plugs
http://www.sonyericsson.com/putyourearsincontrol/
I don't think they ever shipped, though.
Here's a nice public list of ideas from one person: http://iotd.patrickandrews.com/
Here's another one: http://stealchoofsideas.blogspot.com/
For a couple of years, my lab managers would rely on my idea rate in setting quarterly goals for number of invention disclosures filed. Yes, we did MBO and OKR even in research labs.
Fortunately, I was able to keep my filing to disclosure ratio quite high (21/36) (even if it was never tracked officially). Agree that just because the company decides to file a patent does not automatically make it a good idea.
Eventually I got back to coding and went away from ideas. The gulf between ideas and implementation is not just time, its also mindset. I am learning how to balance the two.
The starter-less engine.
If the ECU knows the position of the crank (because of the encoder on the crank these days) it also knows which piston is past top-dead-point.
Inject some fuel in to the air already present in the cylinder, spark and go!
No starter motor required.
Regarding the ideas, I think the way you are organized and how you have this set up is at least as impressive as the fact that you've had 1000 (not so bad) ideas. My way of 'filing' an idea is usually to register a domain name in the hope that when the time to fish for a new project comes around that I still remember what it was about.
I agree with the theme in a lot of these comments: It's a good idea if you have a plan of attack. I've had lots of ideas (eg battery powered heated wetsuit! damn, it's been done) and am now working on one where I have the unique combination of training, opportunity, luck, etc.
What does the HN community think of having a public ideas website? Sort of like ASK HN: Rate my startup. Users can post their ideas from inception and receive creative input, reassurance that someone would buy that, or no-way don't waste your time building that.
I've seen a few sites like that over the years but they die fairly quickly. This is not to say it's a waste of time, but to point out some basic problems such a site needs to overcome.
One problem is that a general forum is not attractive to specialists (who might have to invest time just to explain why something would be useful in the first place), with the result that suggestions trend towards a blend of trivial and naive. Another is the nagging sense that the more well-specified an idea is, the more likely it is to be be exploited for private gain, and since one can't patent or copyright an idea per se, and building a prototype plus filing an application for a patent is quite expensive, there's not much economic incentive to develop ideas to that point, even if the goal is to make the patent public domain (so as not to allow private monopolies).
"one can't patent... an idea per se"
Actually, this is precisely what patents are for. You don't need to implement an invention in order to obtain a patent, you just need to describe it in sufficient detail "as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use [the invention]" [1]
[1] http://www.bitlaw.com/source/35usc/index.html
This is true, though the patent office can require a model (s.114 via the same link), so in practice you'd probably want that on hand. I was just trying to distinguish between the 'cool' basic idea that's not patentable and the expensive detailed recipe that is.
There is the http://ideaaday.org/ site. You can comment the ideas. Knowing that there are a million ideas out there keeps me off the brain crack. http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/07/071106.html
I'm still wondering if this idea is good: http://techneur.com/post/635311152/announcing-mindspread Call it 'Pay-It-Forward for Books'
It's essentially a webapp where you give someone a book with the promise that when they are done reading it, they will then give it someone else, and so on and so forth. You could then visualize your 'impact' upon the world by seeing how many books you've spread and where they've gone.
Any input?
Similar idea: http://www.bookmooch.com/
You're supposed to trade books, you use points to order books, get points by sending them, etc.
Thanks for pointing this out. There is one major difference, Mindspread is suppose to be completely altruistic.
Something similar is bookcrossing.com.
You read a book, then 'release it in to the wild' by leaving it in a public place with a sticker and unique book-crossing ID. Other people can then pick it up and pass it on, leaving a trail online of it's travel across the globe.
It can be entirely free, although there is a store where you can order the stickers, and unlock 'pro' features on the website.
I regularly record my ideas like this. Most have never been implemented, but I find the exercise of writing them down and thinking them through helpful and rewarding in itself.
If anyone is interested, the site is free and hosted here: http://idealogue.heroku.com
Source here: http://github.com/robinator/ideas
You may want to know that input isn't filtered: http://idealogue.heroku.com/ideas/54
Look page source Line 70 to 94.
Thanks, I'll check it out.
Does anyone else generate ideas like this? And if so, what percentage turn out to be good?
Yes, though regrettably without your level of discipline and patience, so reviewing my old notebooks makes me feel scatterbrained. One thing I'm going to steal from you is the practice of numbering concepts: quantifying them is a great way to mitigate over- and under-confidence.
Of course, a lot of 'bad' ideas only seem so because it's not obvious at the time how the cost of implementation would justify the benefit. For example, I like your idea of pausing the music when the headphones are off. Downside: the requirement for sensors in the headphones, signal infrastructure going back to the sound source, and so on. Possible workaround: ability to measure micro-variations in power consumption consistent with worn/unworn pressure differentials.
This is a good place to post and critique these sorts of ideas: http://www.halfbakery.com/