- 20comments
- 45comments
- 27comments
- 583comments
- 135comments
- 223comments
- 82comments
- 170comments
- 71comments
- 39comments
- 4comments
- 1comments
- 234comments
- 20comments
- 155comments
- 11comments
- 104comments
- 24comments
- 59comments
- 27comments
- —discuss
- 44comments
- 370comments
- 12comments
- 108comments
- 39comments
- 58comments
- 49comments
- 44comments
- 39comments
I think it’s more like ‘The absolute maximum possible degree of theft’ there can’t be larger, it’s everything current and past.
It's the robbery of all of our culture to sell it back to us at a mark-up. Crimes this large are crimes against humanity. So many people whose life's work got appropriated without consideration, compensation or consent it is baffling.
It is said that at the heart of every great fortune there is a great crime, so it should be no surprise that the most valuable companies on the planet will most likely result from this crime. And given that justice can be bought by those with the most money you can forget about anything coming of this.
At least the Chinese AI companies are doing good service open-sourcing their models back to the public.
Has it affected DD as deeply as it as affected software engineering? Guessing clients feel a lot more "empowered" or "independent" and knowledgeable these days? I liked doing DD, just as much as I enjoyed developing, but it must be dying a slow death too. What's changed in how DD reports are produced?
Would regulation help with that? Right now you can download free models that have been trained on that "stolen" data.
With regulation and compensation, only rich companies would be able to do that, and they would definitely not give it back for free. I put "stolen" in quotation marks because it's still unclear if we can call that stealing. Nobody would say a human reading a book and learning from it is stealing. I'm not saying that a machine doing the same is equivalent, but the only think I am sure of is that I am not sure we can call it "stealing".
[delayed]
And here we are, just watching and doing nothing..
Well… Marx would say “theft of labor” is fundamental for the capitalist system to operate. The sin is when you “steal” from the capitalists. That’s why you can’t distill from a commercial model.
I understand the sentiment and partly agree. But also, the original has not gone anywhere. You're free to accumulate knowledge in the old way just as before. So maybe it's not theft of knowledge that we should be angry about, it's something else harder to define.
Lots of the original content is no longer available. Bots kill sites, AI kills monetization - both results in the original material disappearing.
If corporations weren't already owning the consumer, with AI it does this by many orders of magnitude. If something isn't done to prevent AI from being used to farm the masses for data, we will be living in a sci-fi dystopia without a doubt.
If someone asked what is 'the largest theft of labor in human history' I would have thought slavery.
I remember techchrunch.com making the argument that IP Infringment != Theft in the music piracy era.. how quickly the tide turns :)