- 4comments
- 39comments
- 25comments
- 553comments
- 133comments
- 221comments
- 81comments
- 169comments
- 34comments
- 70comments
- 1comments
- 231comments
- 155comments
- 2comments
- 11comments
- 98comments
- 2comments
- 24comments
- —discuss
- 55comments
- 58comments
- 25comments
- 41comments
- 367comments
- 106comments
- 10comments
- 49comments
- 39comments
- 10comments
- 42comments
The headline doesn’t accurately capture the substance of the article. The article does say it doesn’t find evidence for “mass hysterectomies”, but it does say that a review of medical records indicated that several women had procedures performed on them without informed consent and without any justification. The most salacious of the allegations might not be true, but it’s clear that the behavior of the medical personnel here is ethically beyond the pale.
Last week the claim was it's Nazi like mass sterilisations. Even though that's not even how you would sterilise women to commit a genocide, USA are Nazis.
This week it's "beyond the pale" they might have given women medical procedures they need but might not fully understand.
I think I don't care.
Whatever is really happening here is not great but I'm sick of the lies.
Now I question their seperating their children stories. I assume they were lying then too.
"More migrant women say they didn’t OK surgery in detention"
Headline altered
It's a direct followup to this - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24474830
It has no interest in itself as an article. It is HN meta.
It is a direct quote from the article