- 133comments
- 263comments
- 6comments
- 182comments
- 162comments
- 41comments
- 144comments
- 256comments
- 87comments
- 245comments
- 131comments
- 128comments
- 7comments
- 22comments
- 15comments
- 61comments
- 2comments
- 134comments
- 93comments
- 38comments
- 253comments
- 132comments
- 62comments
- 4comments
- 46comments
- 68comments
- 15comments
- 30comments
- 13comments
- 61comments
Mmmm... It seems in the world of politics, esp. populist politics, more facts don't bring better policies. They are simply ignored, or accused of being lies pushed by the ennemies.
-- Linton Barwick, In The Loop (2009)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdoN1LWGgfQ
The firms who do not win the visa lottery “just become smaller firms” instead of hiring market-rate labor because they still have to compete in a market against other firms who won the visa lottery and have access to below-market-rate labor.
Did the economists who ran this study miss this? Do they explain it?
AEA leans strongly left. I wouldn't put much store in this.
Yet another chamber of commerce article clamoring for more cheap labor without addressing where all of these people are supposed to live.
Proving that the issue is capitalism and its systemic need for a reserve army of labour (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserve_army_of_labour) to pressure people to accept unfair conditions of living/work