- 133comments
- 263comments
- 6comments
- 182comments
- 162comments
- 41comments
- 144comments
- 256comments
- 87comments
- 245comments
- 131comments
- 128comments
- 7comments
- 22comments
- 15comments
- 61comments
- 2comments
- 134comments
- 93comments
- 38comments
- 253comments
- 132comments
- 62comments
- 4comments
- 46comments
- 68comments
- 15comments
- 30comments
- 13comments
- 61comments
Article is just a vague summary of https://www.saturnos.com/report/artificial-authority
Anecdotally, current models seem to be decent at general personal finance principles - certainly better than the majority of personal finance education that people get exposed to unless they seek it out and read a variety of books and sources. But I wouldn't trust them with direct decision making with actual money due to the training lag time on current tax policy, etc.
I would prefer to use agent-assisted python scripts that chatbot.
Agreed, this works really well for me. Double check the math/python, execute many times without a LLM that can change o
I like how FT makes me accept cookies from their 46 “technology” (advertising) partners before showing me that the article is behind a paywall anyway.
You actually like that? I find it kind of annoying.
No they do not like it, it is a figure of speech to underline how much they do not like it.
Single shot or with reasoning enabled? My experience is that reasoning dramatically reduces hallucinations and improves output quality. I don't trust models without it.