- 23comments
- 18comments
- 81comments
- 50comments
- 44comments
- 7comments
- 29comments
- 143comments
- 196comments
- 802comments
- 12comments
- 114comments
- 1034comments
- 82comments
- —discuss
- 57comments
- 3comments
- 68comments
- 417comments
- 271comments
- 6comments
- 232comments
- 584comments
- 175comments
- 64comments
- 537comments
- 186comments
- 160comments
- 37comments
- 32comments
Interesting way to guarantee some sort of safety for automated decisioning
Tenuo guarantees the agent's actions stay within the defined boundaries but it doesn't influence what the agent "thinks" about or what it decides to do within those boundaries
The task bound idea is interesting. I’m starting to hear more of this theoretically on AI enterprise architecture. Has anyone actually implemented it successfully?
Interesting to experiment with. As AI agents get faster and cheaper (and thus more accessible) having good governance around their actions becomes more important to cut down on shadow agents/runaway agentic actions and consequences
Shockingly vibed blog post. Actually hurt my brain reading this and I had to stop.
Haven't seen many attempts to govern agents using task bound authority. Curious to see how this holds up in real world implementation.