- 16comments
- 14comments
- 326comments
- 28comments
- 39comments
- 223comments
- 20comments
- 752comments
- 101comments
- 8comments
- 122comments
- 50comments
- 3comments
- 6comments
- 8comments
- 84comments
- 42comments
- 51comments
- 56comments
- 120comments
- 40comments
- 113comments
- 5comments
- 96comments
- 7comments
- 100comments
- 36comments
- 22comments
- 33comments
- 124comments
Ah, I see we have now moved on to proving who has the tormentiest nexus. Never underestimate humankind's ability to outshine its own hyperbole.
Link for those who didn't get the reference:
https://x.com/AlexBlechman/status/1457842724128833538
Meanwhile Chinese companies just use massive government subsidy to distill American models and give the models to everyone for free. That's true communism. /s
[citation needed]
Seriously:
Domyn's CEO says OpenAI, Anthropic are lying about safety
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49875725
Because AI genuinely is an extremely powerful and extremely dangerous technology, and the "best practices" of dealing with that are still being written.
OpenAI, for example, thought their sandboxes were good enough. As their AIs got more and more advanced, they kept proving them wrong - sandbox after sandbox.
And that's today's AI problems. AI capabilities are still improving - if there's a limit to that, we are yet to find it. Coupled with how willing today's AIs are to break the rules and resort to "hack the world" in their problem solving? Very concerning.
You know we’re living it off times when this is not an Onion article.
I’ve never seen CEOs work so hard to make the public aware of how dangerous and out of control their flagship product is. It makes me automatically assume they’re scheming about something else like regulatory capture to protect their market.
Or perhaps they've been saying this for literally decades because they earnestly believe it.
Which CEO said this for 'literally decades'? And if so why are they still pursuing it then?
Most children have learned touching a hot stove is bad for them. Then why still do it at the age of 40?
If they believe it, they can stop. All of them. There's no sign though that any pacing/slowdown or whatever is in place, zero.
Meanwhile, users don't seem to care one iota.