- 232comments
- 8comments
- 7comments
- 3comments
- 46comments
- 14comments
- 372comments
- 23comments
- 17comments
- 101comments
- 25comments
- 53comments
- 1comments
- 121comments
- 5comments
- —discuss
- 232comments
- 133comments
- 64comments
- 64comments
- 42comments
- 391comments
- 641comments
- —discuss
- 163comments
- 165comments
- 1comments
- 31comments
- 421comments
- 411comments
Looks like GitHub issue tracker is embedded in git itself. Interesting!
Someone is taking lessons from fossil-scm.
Looks great by the way.
Looks really nice, I wonder why there hasn't been a project with this exact name and functionality before. When I think about it, "git bug" is quite limiting (the bug vs. feature discussion).
Naming things is hard, but I can see that it might feel unnatural to use "git bug" to track features. Maybe that's totally okay because it does one thing - tracking bugs - very well, and the whole feature roadmap is living in another system/process anyways?
Their logo is a ladybug so everything works out in the end.
Isn't everything nowadays a bug?
Only once it gets fixed does it become a feature.
;)
Bugzilla has been using the term "bug" to track features for nearly 3 decades now. Doesn't seem to hamper them.
b4 maintainer and Director of LF IT Konstantin Ryabitsev demo-ed git-bug support in b4 and cgit (kernel.org fork) just this week at the Kernel Recipes conference:
https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/maintainer/bugs.html
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/b4/b4.git/bugs/
https://kernel-recipes.org/en/2026/2026/09/22/live-blog-day-... (shameless plug)