Having such a high profile film rating site be potentially owned by a film studio has serious conflict of interest issues. Same goes for amazon buying imdb and they've already used that to adjust scores for at least one film they released because of bad reviews. I'm happy to see this get some attention here after my submission didn't because the potential implications of this purchase are big.
Edit: I believe I made an error re the claim imdb changed the score of at least one amazon owned film. See replies for more info. Apologies!
The problem with Amazon owning IMDB, or A24 potentially owning Letterboxd, is not that they would screw with it, but that every move they make will be put through that lease. Even with NYT being the owners I’m sure there would be the regular ‘drama’ of whatever woke/anti-woke influence they may have over it.
Ah actually unfortunately I think I made a mistake there so I apologize for that. Should have double checked instead of speaking from memory. I believe I was thinking of The Little Mermaid change but it seems like that wasn't their film. Sorry!
Truly, everything good gets milked dry for someone's exit. I know that's usually celebrated in a forum like this, but is it possible things are just a bit out of balance?
If it's bought by A24 or Sony that's absolutely gonna be a conflict on interest and I cannot imagine the platform would ever be impartial for the reviews of their movies. It NYT buys it, then it would be turned into a woke nonsense project. I guess all good things must come to an end.
I continue to be baffled by this sale. Letterboxd was acquired by Tiny 3 years ago, Tiny’s entire premise is that they hold for the long term. Selling after 3 years is not long term. I don’t understand why Tiny would undermine their raison d’etre unless it’s because the founders (who retain a minority stake) are pushing for it.
Tiny just recently updated their website to emphasize how long they’ve owned each property which is especially confusing given they’re now offloading things https://tiny.com/companies/letterboxd
“Tiny's model — long-term ownership, founder autonomy, no pressure to flip the company in three to five years — fit naturally.”
America hasn’t had real antitrust law for >40 years. It should be impossible for a review site to be purchased by a company that makes things reviewed on that site. Reagan era neoliberalism defanged antitrust, and brought on the corpo-hellscape we live in today.
I use https://movielens.org/ and it is ran by the University of Minnesota.
This looks almost too good to be true! Thank you for sharing. I'm going to migrate my 600+ library over tonight.
Is there an ATproto or activity pub version of letterboxd? I like A24, but not sure how much I trust Sony or the NYT to run it reasonably
A24 is the biggest cheater on Letterboxd, buying 5 star raters en masse. Warner is not much better. Sony is ok.
What 5 start ratings have they purchased?
https://popfeed.social/ on ATproto
Can't wait for the enshittification of Letterboxd.
Dear God, don't let Amazon do what it did to Goodreads here.
Amazing. So Imdb 2.0 has become Imdb 2.0.
Having such a high profile film rating site be potentially owned by a film studio has serious conflict of interest issues. Same goes for amazon buying imdb and they've already used that to adjust scores for at least one film they released because of bad reviews. I'm happy to see this get some attention here after my submission didn't because the potential implications of this purchase are big.
Edit: I believe I made an error re the claim imdb changed the score of at least one amazon owned film. See replies for more info. Apologies!
Any source on that ? I found nothing serious, just reddit and Facebook post. No one serious is reporting on it.
The problem with Amazon owning IMDB, or A24 potentially owning Letterboxd, is not that they would screw with it, but that every move they make will be put through that lease. Even with NYT being the owners I’m sure there would be the regular ‘drama’ of whatever woke/anti-woke influence they may have over it.
Ah actually unfortunately I think I made a mistake there so I apologize for that. Should have double checked instead of speaking from memory. I believe I was thinking of The Little Mermaid change but it seems like that wasn't their film. Sorry!
https://www.avclub.com/the-little-mermaid-imdb-changes-ratin...
Claude :)
Truly, everything good gets milked dry for someone's exit. I know that's usually celebrated in a forum like this, but is it possible things are just a bit out of balance?
Referenced NYT piece (unlocked): https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/24/business/media/letterboxd...
Related background on the state of growth there from a few months ago:
The Rise and (Potential) Fall of Letterboxd
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48463894
so glad I move over to TMDB the other day. Letterboxd layout is the worst.
If it's bought by A24 or Sony that's absolutely gonna be a conflict on interest and I cannot imagine the platform would ever be impartial for the reviews of their movies. It NYT buys it, then it would be turned into a woke nonsense project. I guess all good things must come to an end.
part of the charm of letterboxd is that its median reviewer is far more woke than every NYT contributor combined, imo.
Heh, the name makes it sound like a daemon.
service letterboxd enable; service letterboxd start
Damn, that asking price is insane
I continue to be baffled by this sale. Letterboxd was acquired by Tiny 3 years ago, Tiny’s entire premise is that they hold for the long term. Selling after 3 years is not long term. I don’t understand why Tiny would undermine their raison d’etre unless it’s because the founders (who retain a minority stake) are pushing for it.
Tiny just recently updated their website to emphasize how long they’ve owned each property which is especially confusing given they’re now offloading things https://tiny.com/companies/letterboxd
“Tiny's model — long-term ownership, founder autonomy, no pressure to flip the company in three to five years — fit naturally.”
…?
so you _believed_ them -- that is the only takeaway from this.
The much more pertinent point is that it is counter to their apparent track record.
I imagine that in life and business there’s no such thing as a decision that is never regrettable. I guess it just didn’t work out.
Why not $3B? or $30B, even?
America hasn’t had real antitrust law for >40 years. It should be impossible for a review site to be purchased by a company that makes things reviewed on that site. Reagan era neoliberalism defanged antitrust, and brought on the corpo-hellscape we live in today.